Supriya Sule Slams Maharashtra Government Over Drug Scourge, Corruption, and Mounting Cash Seizures
NCP(SP) leader Supriya Sule accuses Maharashtra government of failing to act on rampant drug abuse, corruption, and a major ministerial cash seizure—urging reforms to restore public trust and safety.
NewsSutra
Sharply criticizing the Maharashtra administration, Nationalist Congress Party (SP) MP Supriya Sule has accused the state government of turning a blind eye to the escalating trio of drug circulation, corruption, and unaccounted cash—arguing that the leadership has failed to stem the tide. Her remarks come amid a high-profile ministerial cash seizure and a controversial Enforcement Directorate (ED) chargesheet, which have triggered urgent questions about governance and political accountability.
Sule’s Indictment: Government Failure Across Multiple Fronts
At a press briefing in Mumbai yesterday, Ms. Sule held the ruling coalition responsible for allowing deep-seated problems to fester. She cited three interconnected failures:
-
Lax enforcement on drug trafficking and substance abuse
-
High-level corruption and cabinet ministers implicated in wrongdoing
-
Unexplained cash discovered in official homes yet no political fallout
She demanded that Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis explain the government’s inaction over these mounting crises.
1. Drug Abuse Epidemic: What Sule Uncovered
Sule began by denouncing the lack of response to the rise of synthetic drugs like MD and ice—now haunting both rural districts and urban screenings. She contended that the state police and the Anti-Narcotics Special Cell (ANSC) have been reactive rather than proactive, relying on sensational media coverage instead of data-driven crackdowns or preventive interventions.
According to state-held records, drug seizures doubled over the past two years. Yet Sule says only a fraction translated into substantial convictions or rehabilitation efforts. In politically sensitive areas such as Thane and Raigad, alleged collusion between local political figures and narcotics syndicates has led to rampant trafficking. Sule warned that the state’s inaction amounted to a dangerous compromise of public safety.
2. Ministerial Cash Heist: CPI(M) Leader’s Stash
Central to Sule’s critique was a startling incident: the seizure of over ₹50 crore in cash from the residence of a sitting minister in the ruling coalition earlier this year. Initially, media reports identified the minister as a senior office bearer and alleged the cash represented unrecorded political funding and illicit wealth.
Though the Enforcement Directorate and Income Tax Department launched an investigation, Sule lamented that the accused politician remains in office, with no public pressure or forced resignation—a signal, she argues, of political cover-up and state-corporate impunity. She called this episode a stark illustration of how wealth without accountability can flourish under a supine government.
3. ED Charge-Sheet Controversy: A Politically Sensitive Probe
The second prong of Sule’s condemnation targeted the Enforcement Directorate itself. A partially leaked charge-sheet from an ongoing anti-money laundering case—linked to liquor license allocations—appears to have cleared several unnamed individuals, surprising opposition figures and civil society monitoring groups.
Sule described the leaked document as “selective transparency”, accusing the ED of shielding powerful political figures by omitting critical evidence. The root concern, she said, is institutional capture and politically driven enforcement, undermining both corruption control and financial probity in public life.
4. Political Accountability and Institutional Integrity
In defending her position, Sule stressed that these issues are not isolated but emblematic of wider institutional decay. Police inefficiency, weak investigative units, compromised anti-corruption agencies, and the failure to prosecute offenders create a permissive environment that erodes public trust and harms democracy.
She urged CM Shinde and Dy CM Fadnavis to support a stringent internal audit of government bodies, reassign responsibility among erring officials, and fast-track pending corruption cases in courts. She also wants judicial magistrates to conduct public interest litigation, calling for independent oversight of cash seizures and drug enforcement statistics.
5. Public Safety: Beyond Crime to Community Impact
Sule underlined the broader societal fallout: rising gang activity fueled by drug money, youth addiction in vulnerable districts, and diminished community safety in areas where drug peddlers enjoy political shelter.
Reflecting on recent high-profile overdose deaths in remote villages, she blamed inadequate de-addiction centers and underfunded mental health programs in state-run hospitals. Maharashtra, she said, is engaged in a public health crisis masquerading as lawlessness—and without swift state intervention, the situation could spiral further.
6. Opposition and Civil Society Response
The opposition BJP quickly responded, distancing itself from accused individuals while calling for the governor or central agencies to intervene. They encouraged Sule to support legislative reforms such as electoral funding transparency, cash transaction caps, and compliance audits for public servants.
Civil society organisations welcomed Sule’s challenge. Activists from Transparency International India and the Centre for Media Studies called for an independent inquiry and have begun cataloguing preventive case studies from other states. They believe Maharashtra could serve as a model for redressing entrenched corruption—if there was the will to act.
7. Possible Government Repercussions
The Shinde-Fadnavis government now faces several critical decisions:
-
Accept the challenge: Launch formal internal inquiries and share findings publicly
-
Deflect scrutiny: Side-line Sule’s remarks as political grandstanding
-
Initiate partial action: Charge low-level officials to give the appearance of reform
-
Introduce reforms: Amend state drug police regulations, cash limits, and electoral finance norms
Political analysts say the response may determine how the government is perceived ahead of the next election—morally accountable or self-serving.
8. What Sule Hopes to Achieve
In Sule’s vision, Maharashtra must reclaim moral high ground through concrete reforms:
-
Pass laws limiting cash holdings by MLAs/Ministers
-
Compulsory third-party auditing of departments and disclosure of assets
-
Independent anti-corruption ombudsman with real investigative authority
She insists these measures will address not just superficial issues but reinstate rule-of-law integrity across public office and civil society.
9. Voice of Maharashtra’s Youth
From Pune’s colleges to Aurangabad’s suburbs, young voters have reacted to Sule’s statements with optimism. Social media trending hashtags indicate they view her intervention as a potential game-changer—an authentic attempt to take on the nexus of drug money, political influence, and impunity.
Speakers at youth-led NGOs supported her statement, urging her to move beyond rhetoric with PILs and legislative proposals, and to ensure girl children in villages aren’t exposed to the gangster lifestyle she warned of.
10. Significance for Broader Governance
Maharashtra, as India’s most populous state with a massive economy, often sets trends for institutional reform. Sule’s intervention could catalyse similar scrutiny in other states facing similar challenges, especially those affected by political patronage and drug-linked crimes.
Experts argue this moment could define a turning point in a two-way civil society-government relationship: from reaction to proactive policy-shaping.
Final Word
Supriya Sule’s blistering critique is more than political rhetoric: it is a challenge to Maharashtra’s ruling establishment to either stand by hollow claims or demonstrate leadership through reform and transparency.
By pressing for action on drug enforcement, trafficking of illicit wealth, and executive accountability, she aims to place governance integrity at the center of public policy. Whether the state rises to the challenge—or continues to treat hard evidence as a political inconvenience—is the question that lies ahead.
Only decisive action in the coming months will determine if Maharashtra can reclaim trust in its institutions, or be remembered for its tolerance of unpunished wrongdoing.
