Blood and Ballots: Are Political Assassinations Reshaping Rural India’s Power Landscape?
Political assassinations are surging across rural India. States like Bengal, UP, and Telangana are seeing a violent shift in grassroots politics driven by land, caste, and factional rivalries.
NewsSutra
In the shadowy corners of India’s rural heartland, democracy appears to be under siege. The rise in political assassinations in states like West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, and Telangana is no longer a string of isolated incidents—it’s beginning to show a disturbing pattern. As local elections heat up and political rivalries deepen, a brutal new template for power consolidation is taking shape, one where bullets increasingly replace ballots.
According to recent data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), India recorded a 27% rise in political murders in rural areas between 2022 and 2024. And these killings are not merely driven by ideology. They often revolve around land disputes, caste-based hierarchies, factionalism, and criminal syndicate influence.
For an in-depth view of political crime data, visit the official NCRB website.
West Bengal: Political Loyalty or Political Liability?
No state exemplifies this trend better than West Bengal, where political violence has long had historical roots. However, what sets the current scenario apart is the normalization of political killings at the village and panchayat level.
In June 2023, during the Panchayat elections, over 55 people were killed in clashes allegedly involving TMC, BJP, and CPI(M) cadres. Many of the victims were not leaders but foot soldiers—party workers, local campaigners, and village influencers.
Investigations by local journalists and watchdog NGOs, such as Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), reveal that many rural candidates were threatened, attacked, or killed, either for switching parties or resisting local land grabs disguised as political movements.
A detailed ADR report outlines how the politicization of rural governance has turned gram panchayats into volatile zones where loyalty can be a death sentence.
“The nexus of real estate, sand mining, and political funding is deeply rooted in Bengal’s villages,” said a senior retired IPS officer. “Control of a panchayat often determines who controls local contracts, tenders, and even law enforcement.”
Uttar Pradesh: Caste, Crime, and Killing Fields
In Uttar Pradesh, the story is equally grim but shaped by different contours. Here, caste politics and historical enmity drive much of the rural bloodshed.
The 2024 killing of a Dalit BJP leader in Kanpur Dehat shocked many but didn't surprise political observers. A few months earlier, a Samajwadi Party zila panchayat member was shot dead in Ghazipur over a land dispute with upper-caste rivals, allegedly with political patronage.
According to a report by IndiaSpend, more than 40 political figures in UP’s rural belt have been assassinated since 2020. These include sitting village heads, aspiring MLAs, and even retired bureaucrats venturing into politics.
The line between local muscle power and political machinery has blurred. Political parties often recruit from criminal gangs with the promise of immunity, and in return, these gangs use political clout to settle land scores or dominate lucrative government schemes like MNREGA and PMAY.
In many cases, land disputes and personal vendettas are rebranded as “political killings,” making it harder to trace ideological motives.
Telangana: Local Dominance, Not Party Ideology
Though not traditionally known for political violence, Telangana has seen a recent spike in local political assassinations, especially in districts like Khammam, Warangal, and Nalgonda.
A senior police official in Hyderabad, speaking anonymously, noted a shift: “It’s not about TRS vs. BJP anymore. It’s about local factions fighting for dominance—often under the same party banner.”
In 2024, a ward member affiliated with the ruling BRS was stabbed to death by rivals from the same village over a contract for irrigation equipment procurement. The killing was caught on CCTV and triggered widespread outrage, but no high-ranking arrests followed.
Here, the violence is less about changing political ideology and more about who gets control of village-level administration, especially in areas rich in government spending or infrastructure development.
A detailed case study by PRS Legislative Research sheds light on how decentralization, without parallel institutional safeguards, has increased the risk of corruption and vendetta politics in local self-governance.
Are Assassinations a New Form of Campaigning?
Experts argue that these political killings are part of a larger, evolving trend of power assertion in rural India. As electoral competition intensifies and voter margins shrink, intimidation through violence becomes a tool to dissuade candidatures, silence opposition, and build local hegemony.
Political scientist Suhas Palshikar notes in a recent EPW article, “The turn towards political assassination is the culmination of a long-standing culture of impunity, weaponized by decentralization and fueled by resource competition at the grassroots.”
Adding fuel to this fire is the slow and uneven response by law enforcement agencies, who are often under political pressure, underfunded, or sympathetic to local strongmen.
In some states, rural police stations still operate without proper forensic units or cyber monitoring teams—making preemptive action and post-crime investigation virtually impossible.
The Dangerous Role of Social Media and Misinformation
Social media, too, plays a disturbing role in both glorifying and amplifying political assassinations. Local WhatsApp groups and Facebook pages often share graphic images and polarizing narratives that turn murderers into martyrs and victims into villains.
This not only inflames caste and communal tensions, but also encourages copycat violence among younger political aspirants eager to make their mark in the village ecosystem.
Misinformation can escalate tensions within hours. In multiple cases in Bengal and UP, rumors of political allegiance or betrayal have been enough to incite mobs to kill.
A 2024 fact-checking report by Alt News chronicled several instances where fabricated political rivalries shared via viral videos directly led to fatal attacks in rural constituencies.
What Can Be Done? Policy and Political Reform
While political killings are not new to India, their current frequency and brutality in rural areas demand urgent reforms:
-
Fast-track courts for political crimes should be established at the district level.
-
Mandatory declaration of local candidate security threats and public funding for their protection.
-
Independent rural election monitoring cells, with real-time data sharing between police, election commission, and civil society groups.
-
Electoral disqualification of candidates with criminal links, especially in areas of recent political killings.
These measures require both political will and civic engagement. So far, the response from state governments has been mixed, often marred by partisan interests and coalition compromises.
Conclusion: Democracy on a Knife’s Edge
Rural India has always been seen as the foundation of India’s democratic experiment. But with political killings becoming normalized, this foundation is cracking.
From land and caste to crime and power, the motivations may vary, but the message is dangerously consistent: violence pays in local politics—sometimes with impunity, often with electoral dividends.
Unless there is a collective reckoning—by voters, parties, and institutions alike—the democratic dream in rural India risks being reduced to a blood-stained illusion.
